All foods/Winter Squash, Frozen

1999 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on winter squash, frozen

63% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue63%Moderate organic-buying priority

100 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue37%Moderate organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues5%Moderate organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count1Moderate organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 2

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 0 samples

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
1999Calendar year10063%5%0Withheld
1998Calendar year14978.5%22.1%0Withheld
1997Calendar year22152.9%18.6%0Withheld

Residue detail

What was found on winter squash, frozen?

The most frequently detected residues across all 100 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

100samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
DieldrinOther / mixed60 (60%)0.016 mg/kg0.053 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Diphenylamine (DPA)Other / mixed3 (3%)0.013 mg/kg0.013 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Heptachlor epoxideOther / mixed2 (2%)0.008 mg/kg0.008 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ChlorothalonilOther / mixed1 (1%)0.008 mg/kg0.008 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Endosulfan sulfateOther / mixed1 (1%)0.012 mg/kg0.012 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DDE p,p'Other / mixed1 (1%)0.01 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every winter squash, frozen product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 1999.

Comparable annual records are available for 1999, 1998, 1997.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these winter squash, frozen results

Were pesticide residues detected on winter squash, frozen?

63% of 100 standard-grown samples in the 1999 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean winter squash, frozen were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic winter squash, frozen?

There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.