All foods/Tomato Paste

2020 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on tomato paste

92.9% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue92.9%Higher organic-buying priority

449 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue7.1%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues85.7%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count4Higher organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 13

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic: any residue7%Higher organic-buying priority

57 samples, interpret cautiously

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2020Calendar year44992.9%85.7%577%
2019Calendar year16590.9%85.5%248.3%
2009Calendar year7033.8%0.4%392.6%
2001Calendar year36930.4%14.9%0Withheld

Residue detail

What was found on tomato paste?

The most frequently detected residues across all 506 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

506samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
AzoxystrobinFungicide367 (72.5%)0.005 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DifenoconazoleFungicide309 (61.1%)0.004 mg/kg0.012 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
BifenthrinInsecticide264 (52.2%)0.007 mg/kg0.022 mg/kg0.15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ImidaclopridInsecticide203 (40.1%)0.006 mg/kg0.013 mg/kg6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FluxapyroxadFungicide185 (36.6%)0.005 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg0.7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ClothianidinOther / mixed125 (24.7%)0.003 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg0.8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MethoxyfenozideInsecticide77 (15.2%)0.004 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer)Other / mixed76 (15%)0.004 mg/kg0.007 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FluopyramFungicide67 (13.2%)0.004 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiamethoxamOther / mixed64 (12.6%)0.002 mg/kg0.007 mg/kg0.8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TrifloxystrobinOther / mixed51 (10.1%)0.002 mg/kg0.006 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
PenthiopyradOther / mixed29 (5.7%)0.003 mg/kg0.009 mg/kg3.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DinotefuranOther / mixed20 (4%)0.005 mg/kg0.009 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
AcetamipridInsecticide19 (3.8%)0.003 mg/kg0.007 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Metalaxyl/MefenoxamOther / mixed18 (3.6%)0.007 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
EsfenvalerateOther / mixed16 (3.2%)0.006 mg/kg0.008 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FlutriafolOther / mixed15 (3%)0.003 mg/kg0.005 mg/kg1.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
NovaluronOther / mixed14 (2.8%)0.002 mg/kg0.004 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MetolachlorOther / mixed12 (2.4%)0.002 mg/kg0.002 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MyclobutanilFungicide11 (2.2%)0.004 mg/kg0.007 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every tomato paste product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2020.

Comparable annual records are available for 2020, 2019, 2009, 2001.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these tomato paste results

Were pesticide residues detected on tomato paste?

92.9% of 449 standard-grown samples in the 2020 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean tomato paste were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic tomato paste?

The monitored organic samples had a 7% detection rate, compared with 92.9% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.