478 samples, standard-grown
2010 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year
Pesticide residues found on sweet corn, fresh (on-the-cob)
0.8% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.
All reported results below quantification
Two or more residues detected
Highest observed count: 2
Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance
Withheld: only 3 samples
Residue detail
What was found on sweet corn, fresh (on-the-cob)?
The most frequently detected residues across all 481 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.
481samples checked
Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.
What do these types mean?
- FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
- InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
- HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
- Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
- Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.
These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.
| Residue | Type | Samples | Median | Higher result | Typical published limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methamidophos | Other / mixed | 3 (0.6%) | 0.002 mg/kg | 0.005 mg/kg | 0.02 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Thiamethoxam | Other / mixed | 1 (0.2%) | 0.003 mg/kg | 0.003 mg/kg | 0.02 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Acephate | Other / mixed | 1 (0.2%) | 0.004 mg/kg | 0.004 mg/kg | 0.02 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.
ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.
What this tells you
A monitoring result, not a verdict.
USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every sweet corn, fresh (on-the-cob) product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2010.
Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.
Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.
Compare organic and standard-grown results →Common questions
How to read these sweet corn, fresh (on-the-cob) results
Were pesticide residues detected on sweet corn, fresh (on-the-cob)?
0.8% of 478 standard-grown samples in the 2010 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.
Does that mean sweet corn, fresh (on-the-cob) were unsafe?
No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.
Should I buy organic sweet corn, fresh (on-the-cob)?
There were only 3 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.