2006 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on poultry, thigh

8.2% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →

Any residue8.2%Lower organic-buying priority

655 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue91.8%Lower organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues2.7%Lower organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 3

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 0 samples

Residue detail

What was found on poultry, thigh?

The most frequently detected residues across all 655 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

655samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?

FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

Residue	Type	Samples	Median	Higher result	Typical published limit
Piperonyl butoxide	Other / mixed	22 (3.4%)	0.012 mg/kg	0.077 mg/kg	3 mg/kg
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DDE p,p'	Other / mixed	20 (3.1%)	0.001 mg/kg	0.003 mg/kg	5 mg/kg
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Carbaryl	Other / mixed	15 (2.3%)	0.001 mg/kg	0.001 mg/kg	5 mg/kg
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MGK-264	Other / mixed	14 (2.1%)	0.009 mg/kg	0.086 mg/kg	0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fipronil	Other / mixed	2 (0.3%)	0.001 mg/kg	0.001 mg/kg	0.02 mg/kg
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
1-Naphthol	Other / mixed	1 (0.2%)	0.003 mg/kg	0.003 mg/kg	5 mg/kg
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Thiabendazole	Fungicide	1 (0.2%)	0.005 mg/kg	0.005 mg/kg	0.1 mg/kg
Reviewed evidence What regulators assessed: The long-term guidance value was based on body-weight suppression and nephrosis observed in an animal study at higher doses. Reference values Role Fungicide and veterinary anthelmintic Long-term reference (ADI) 0–0.1 mg/kg body weight per day Single-day reference (ARfD) 1 mg/kg body weight (general population); 0.3 mg/kg for women of child-bearing age Reviewed from WHO/FAO JMPR, 2019 ↗
Pyrethrins	Other / mixed	1 (0.2%)	0.1 mg/kg	0.1 mg/kg	0.2 mg/kg
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every poultry, thigh product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2006.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these poultry, thigh results

Were pesticide residues detected on poultry, thigh?

8.2% of 655 standard-grown samples in the 2006 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean poultry, thigh were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic poultry, thigh?

There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.