All foods/Potatoes

2024 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on potatoes

98.3% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue98.3%Higher organic-buying priority

173 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue1.7%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues42.8%Moderate organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count1Moderate organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 6

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 4 samples

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2024Calendar year17398.3%42.8%4Withheld
2023Calendar year69394.1%53.8%1631.2%
2022Calendar year51795.2%50.7%1258.3%
2016Calendar year68499.7%85.8%24100%
2015Calendar year69199.9%86%16100%
2009Calendar year72793.3%57.8%1752.9%
2008Calendar year73490.5%57.9%1090%
2002Calendar year36390.1%19%785.7%
2001Calendar year72282.4%21.3%1154.5%
2000Calendar year36870.1%11.7%1Withheld
1995Calendar year70583.3%37%2Withheld
1994Calendar year69278%33.5%2Withheld

Residue detail

What was found on potatoes?

The most frequently detected residues across all 177 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

177samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
ChlorprophamHerbicide169 (95.5%)3.1 mg/kg8.7 mg/kg30 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FluopyramFungicide26 (14.7%)0.010 mg/kg0.033 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
AzoxystrobinFungicide20 (11.3%)0.155 mg/kg1.1 mg/kg8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DifenoconazoleFungicide19 (10.7%)0.23 mg/kg1.3 mg/kg4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiamethoxamOther / mixed17 (9.6%)0.008 mg/kg0.018 mg/kg0.25 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiabendazoleFungicide16 (9%)0.076 mg/kg1.7 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Reviewed evidence

What regulators assessed: The long-term guidance value was based on body-weight suppression and nephrosis observed in an animal study at higher doses.

Reference values
Role
Fungicide and veterinary anthelmintic
Long-term reference (ADI)
0–0.1 mg/kg body weight per day
Single-day reference (ARfD)
1 mg/kg body weight (general population); 0.3 mg/kg for women of child-bearing age

Reviewed from WHO/FAO JMPR, 2019

FludioxonilFungicide14 (7.9%)0.315 mg/kg0.81 mg/kg6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Propamocarb hydrochlorideOther / mixed5 (2.8%)0.015 mg/kg0.028 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DDE p,p'Other / mixed4 (2.3%)0.01 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ImidaclopridInsecticide4 (2.3%)0.024 mg/kg0.035 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pentachloroaniline (PCA)Other / mixed3 (1.7%)0.015 mg/kg0.015 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pentachlorobenzene (PCB)Other / mixed3 (1.7%)0.01 mg/kg0.015 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
PenthiopyradOther / mixed2 (1.1%)0.002 mg/kg0.002 mg/kg0.06 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FlutolanilOther / mixed2 (1.1%)0.006 mg/kg0.007 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MetolachlorOther / mixed2 (1.1%)0.029 mg/kg0.05 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
BoscalidFungicide1 (0.6%)0.006 mg/kg0.006 mg/kg0.05 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
2,6-DIPNOther / mixed1 (0.6%)0.41 mg/kg0.41 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every potatoes product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Comparable annual records are available for 2024, 2023, 2022, 2016, 2015, 2009, 2008, 2002, 2001, 2000, 1995, 1994.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these potatoes results

Were pesticide residues detected on potatoes?

98.3% of 173 standard-grown samples in the 2024 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean potatoes were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic potatoes?

There were only 4 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.