All foods/Plums, Dried (Prunes)

2018 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on plums, dried (prunes)

50.5% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue50.5%Moderate organic-buying priority

535 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue49.5%Moderate organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues15.7%Moderate organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count1Moderate organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 4

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic: any residue9.4%Moderate organic-buying priority

32 samples, interpret cautiously

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2018Calendar year53550.5%15.7%329.4%
2017Calendar year17355.5%22%1816.7%
2006Calendar year21610.2%2.3%812.5%
2005Calendar year15013.3%2.7%3Withheld

Residue detail

What was found on plums, dried (prunes)?

The most frequently detected residues across all 567 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

567samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
MethoxyfenozideInsecticide57 (10.1%)0.006 mg/kg0.033 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
HexythiazoxOther / mixed49 (8.6%)0.006 mg/kg0.019 mg/kg1.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Diphenylamine (DPA)Other / mixed40 (7.1%)0.003 mg/kg0.004 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
AzoxystrobinFungicide37 (6.5%)0.004 mg/kg0.006 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
BoscalidFungicide37 (6.5%)0.009 mg/kg0.018 mg/kg3.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Piperonyl butoxideOther / mixed34 (6%)0.023 mg/kg0.11 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Carbendazim (MBC)Other / mixed20 (3.5%)0.002 mg/kg0.004 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ImidaclopridInsecticide18 (3.2%)0.006 mg/kg0.012 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FluopyramFungicide18 (3.2%)0.014 mg/kg0.027 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
CyprodinilFungicide16 (2.8%)0.008 mg/kg0.016 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FenbuconazoleOther / mixed8 (1.4%)0.007 mg/kg0.018 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiabendazoleFungicide8 (1.4%)0.002 mg/kg0.003 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Reviewed evidence

What regulators assessed: The long-term guidance value was based on body-weight suppression and nephrosis observed in an animal study at higher doses.

Reference values
Role
Fungicide and veterinary anthelmintic
Long-term reference (ADI)
0–0.1 mg/kg body weight per day
Single-day reference (ARfD)
1 mg/kg body weight (general population); 0.3 mg/kg for women of child-bearing age

Reviewed from WHO/FAO JMPR, 2019

FenhexamidOther / mixed5 (0.9%)0.027 mg/kg0.075 mg/kg2.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TrifloxystrobinOther / mixed5 (0.9%)0.002 mg/kg0.009 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
PyriproxyfenOther / mixed4 (0.7%)0.001 mg/kg0.005 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
PyraclostrobinFungicide3 (0.5%)0.005 mg/kg0.006 mg/kg2.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
AcetamipridInsecticide3 (0.5%)0.002 mg/kg0.003 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TebuconazoleFungicide2 (0.4%)0.022 mg/kg0.023 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pirimiphos methylOther / mixed2 (0.4%)0.004 mg/kg0.006 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
SpirodiclofenOther / mixed2 (0.4%)0.014 mg/kg0.016 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every plums, dried (prunes) product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2018.

Comparable annual records are available for 2018, 2017, 2006, 2005.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these plums, dried (prunes) results

Were pesticide residues detected on plums, dried (prunes)?

50.5% of 535 standard-grown samples in the 2018 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean plums, dried (prunes) were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic plums, dried (prunes)?

The monitored organic samples had a 9.4% detection rate, compared with 50.5% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.