All foods/Pinto Beans, Canned

2009 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on pinto beans, canned

3.4% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue3.4%Lower organic-buying priority

325 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue96.6%Lower organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues0%Lower organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 1

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic: any residue2.1%Lower organic-buying priority

47 samples, interpret cautiously

Residue detail

What was found on pinto beans, canned?

The most frequently detected residues across all 372 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

372samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
BoscalidFungicide11 (3%)0.005 mg/kg0.005 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiabendazoleFungicide1 (0.3%)0.003 mg/kg0.003 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Reviewed evidence

What regulators assessed: The long-term guidance value was based on body-weight suppression and nephrosis observed in an animal study at higher doses.

Reference values
Role
Fungicide and veterinary anthelmintic
Long-term reference (ADI)
0–0.1 mg/kg body weight per day
Single-day reference (ARfD)
1 mg/kg body weight (general population); 0.3 mg/kg for women of child-bearing age

Reviewed from WHO/FAO JMPR, 2019

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every pinto beans, canned product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2009.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these pinto beans, canned results

Were pesticide residues detected on pinto beans, canned?

3.4% of 325 standard-grown samples in the 2009 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean pinto beans, canned were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic pinto beans, canned?

The monitored organic samples had a 2.1% detection rate, compared with 3.4% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.