All foods/Cherries, Frozen

2016 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on cherries, frozen

100% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue100%Higher organic-buying priority

131 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue0%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues95.4%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count6Higher organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 13

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic: any residue100%Lower organic-buying priority

13 samples, interpret cautiously

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2016Calendar year131100%95.4%13100%
2015Calendar year408100%99%45100%
2014Calendar year27299.6%98.9%10100%

Residue detail

What was found on cherries, frozen?

The most frequently detected residues across all 144 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

144samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
AcetamipridInsecticide92 (63.9%)0.015 mg/kg0.055 mg/kg1.2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
PyraclostrobinFungicide62 (43.1%)0.028 mg/kg0.13 mg/kg2.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
BoscalidFungicide53 (36.8%)0.04 mg/kg0.27 mg/kg3.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TebuconazoleFungicide50 (34.7%)0.045 mg/kg1.1 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FenbuconazoleOther / mixed47 (32.6%)0.025 mg/kg0.49 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TrifloxystrobinOther / mixed44 (30.6%)0.026 mg/kg0.077 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiaclopridOther / mixed41 (28.5%)0.017 mg/kg0.06 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FenpropathrinOther / mixed40 (27.8%)0.255 mg/kg0.63 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Cyhalothrin, Total (Cyhalothrin-L + R157836 epimer)Other / mixed40 (27.8%)0.039 mg/kg0.076 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiamethoxamOther / mixed39 (27.1%)0.029 mg/kg0.16 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Spinosad AOther / mixed33 (22.9%)0.01 mg/kg0.03 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ImidaclopridInsecticide31 (21.5%)0.046 mg/kg0.15 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Carbendazim (MBC)Other / mixed30 (20.8%)0.018 mg/kg0.34 mg/kg20 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
IprodioneOther / mixed30 (20.8%)0.22 mg/kg1 mg/kg20 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TriflumizoleOther / mixed25 (17.4%)0.02 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg1.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
BuprofezinOther / mixed21 (14.6%)0.006 mg/kg0.022 mg/kg1.9 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MyclobutanilFungicide18 (12.5%)0.003 mg/kg0.054 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
CarbarylOther / mixed17 (11.8%)0.026 mg/kg0.65 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Spinosad DOther / mixed11 (7.6%)0.005 mg/kg0.007 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DimethoateOther / mixed11 (7.6%)0.014 mg/kg0.052 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every cherries, frozen product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2016.

Comparable annual records are available for 2016, 2015, 2014.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these cherries, frozen results

Were pesticide residues detected on cherries, frozen?

100% of 131 standard-grown samples in the 2016 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean cherries, frozen were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic cherries, frozen?

The monitored organic samples had a 100% detection rate, compared with 100% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.