All foods/Cabbage

2019 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on cabbage

25.8% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue25.8%Lower organic-buying priority

291 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue74.2%Lower organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues7.9%Moderate organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 3

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic: any residue0%Moderate organic-buying priority

9 samples, interpret cautiously

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2019Calendar year29125.8%7.9%90%
2018Calendar year67927%10.2%280%
2017Calendar year34325.9%8.7%110%
2011Calendar year72914%0.3%130%
2010Calendar year73415.1%1%911.1%

Residue detail

What was found on cabbage?

The most frequently detected residues across all 300 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

300samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
ImidaclopridInsecticide21 (7%)0.014 mg/kg0.029 mg/kg3.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
AzoxystrobinFungicide11 (3.7%)0.003 mg/kg0.045 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ThiamethoxamOther / mixed11 (3.7%)0.015 mg/kg0.063 mg/kg4.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
BifenthrinInsecticide8 (2.7%)0.014 mg/kg0.039 mg/kg4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MethomylOther / mixed6 (2%)0.018 mg/kg0.031 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
PyraclostrobinFungicide6 (2%)0.004 mg/kg0.043 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FenamidoneOther / mixed5 (1.7%)0.023 mg/kg0.043 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FluopyramFungicide5 (1.7%)0.017 mg/kg0.018 mg/kg4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MethoxyfenozideInsecticide5 (1.7%)0.014 mg/kg0.039 mg/kg7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
CyfluthrinOther / mixed4 (1.3%)0.008 mg/kg0.022 mg/kg2.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
CypermethrinOther / mixed4 (1.3%)0.019 mg/kg0.18 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Metalaxyl/MefenoxamOther / mixed3 (1%)0.006 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
FlonicamidOther / mixed2 (0.7%)0.013 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg1.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DicloranOther / mixed1 (0.3%)0.011 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DimethomorphOther / mixed1 (0.3%)0.014 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MandipropamidOther / mixed1 (0.3%)0.028 mg/kg0.028 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
DCPAOther / mixed1 (0.3%)0.006 mg/kg0.006 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
ChlorantraniliproleInsecticide1 (0.3%)0.091 mg/kg0.091 mg/kg4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
PenthiopyradOther / mixed1 (0.3%)0.032 mg/kg0.032 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TriflumizoleOther / mixed1 (0.3%)0.011 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every cabbage product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2019.

Comparable annual records are available for 2019, 2018, 2017, 2011, 2010.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these cabbage results

Were pesticide residues detected on cabbage?

25.8% of 291 standard-grown samples in the 2019 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean cabbage were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic cabbage?

The monitored organic samples had a 0% detection rate, compared with 25.8% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.