All foods/Beef Liver

2002 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on beef liver

0% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue0%Lower organic-buying priority

313 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue100%Lower organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues0%Lower organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 0

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 0 samples

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2002Calendar year3130%0%0Withheld
2001Calendar year3110%0%0Withheld

Residue detail

What was found on beef liver?

The most frequently detected residues across all 313 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

313samples checked

No quantified residues were recorded for this food.

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every beef liver product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2002.

Comparable annual records are available for 2002, 2001.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these beef liver results

Were pesticide residues detected on beef liver?

0% of 313 standard-grown samples in the 2002 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean beef liver were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic beef liver?

There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.