All foods/Barley

2003 · United States · USDA Pesticide Data Program · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on barley

7.8% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue7.8%Lower organic-buying priority

449 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue92.2%Lower organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues0%Lower organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 1

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Compared with the recorded EPA tolerance

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 3 samples

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2003Calendar year4497.8%0%3Withheld
2002Calendar year72514.8%1.4%0Withheld

Residue detail

What was found on barley?

The most frequently detected residues across all 452 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

452samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
ResmethrinOther / mixed21 (4.6%)0.017 mg/kg0.065 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Piperonyl butoxideOther / mixed6 (1.3%)0.017 mg/kg0.017 mg/kg20 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
MalathionOther / mixed3 (0.7%)0.071 mg/kg0.12 mg/kg8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Methoxychlor p,p'Other / mixed2 (0.4%)0.008 mg/kg0.008 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Chlorpyrifos methylOther / mixed1 (0.2%)0.008 mg/kg0.008 mg/kg6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Dichlorvos (DDVP)Other / mixed1 (0.2%)0.033 mg/kg0.033 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
TrifluralinOther / mixed1 (0.2%)0.005 mg/kg0.005 mg/kg0.05 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

USDA PDP selects rotating commodities, with emphasis on foods important to consumer diets, including foods eaten by infants and children. It is not a test of every barley product sold in United States. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2003.

Comparable annual records are available for 2003, 2002.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these barley results

Were pesticide residues detected on barley?

7.8% of 449 standard-grown samples in the 2003 USDA Pesticide Data Program dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean barley were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic barley?

There were only 3 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.