All foods/Spring greens

2021 · United Kingdom · UK Pesticide Residues in Food monitoring · Annual

Pesticide residues found on spring greens

69.3% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue69.3%Moderate organic-buying priority

88 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue30.7%Moderate organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues47.7%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count1Moderate organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 7

Above published limit3.4%Moderate organic-buying priority

Parser-based MRL comparison

Organic: any residue37.5%Moderate organic-buying priority

8 samples, interpret cautiously

Residue detail

What was found on spring greens?

The most frequently detected residues across all 96 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

96samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
Spirotetramat (partial sum)Insecticide33 (34.4%)0.04 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
pendimethalinOther / mixed19 (19.8%)0.02 mg/kg0.06 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
boscalidFungicide19 (19.8%)0.2 mg/kg1.8 mg/kg9 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
azoxystrobinFungicide17 (17.7%)0.06 mg/kg0.7 mg/kg6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
difenoconazoleFungicide17 (17.7%)0.05 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
triallateHerbicide13 (13.5%)0.03 mg/kg0.08 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
pyraclostrobinFungicide13 (13.5%)0.04 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg1.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
indoxacarbOther / mixed9 (9.4%)0.05 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
propamocarb (sum)Fungicide7 (7.3%)0.1 mg/kg1 mg/kg20 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
fluopicolideOther / mixed5 (5.2%)0.05 mg/kg0.1 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
metalaxyl (sum)Other / mixed3 (3.1%)0.03 mg/kg0.03 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
spinosad (sum)Other / mixed2 (2.1%)0.05 mg/kg0.08 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

The UK programme is risk-based and targets foods where residues may be expected. It is not a test of every spring greens product sold in United Kingdom. This entry’s latest included annual release is from 2021.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Broader sample coverage. At least 50 samples: broader monitoring coverage, but still targeted rather than random.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these spring greens results

Were pesticide residues detected on spring greens?

69.3% of 88 standard-grown samples in the 2021 UK Pesticide Residues in Food monitoring dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean spring greens were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic spring greens?

The monitored organic samples had a 37.5% detection rate, compared with 69.3% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.