All foods/Raisins and dried grapes

2026 · United Kingdom · UK Pesticide Residues in Food monitoring · Quarterly Q1

Pesticide residues found on raisins and dried grapes

89.5% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue89.5%Higher organic-buying priority

19 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue10.5%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues84.2%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count7Higher organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 13

Above published limit5.3%Higher organic-buying priority

Parser-based MRL comparison

Organic: any residue20%Moderate organic-buying priority

5 samples, interpret cautiously

Annual context

How monitored results changed

Each row is a separate targeted survey. Samples can differ by retailer, origin and season, so this is context rather than a trend claim.

YearStandard-grown samplesAny residueMultiple residuesOrganic samplesOrganic any residue
2026Quarterly Q11989.5%84.2%520%
2020Annual62100%95.2%100%

Residue detail

What was found on raisins and dried grapes?

The most frequently detected residues across all 24 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

24samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
fluopyramFungicide7 (29.2%)0.04 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg7.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
metalaxyl (sum)Other / mixed7 (29.2%)0.03 mg/kg0.07 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
boscalidFungicide7 (29.2%)0.02 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg25 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
pyrimethanilFungicide7 (29.2%)0.02 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg25 mg/kg
Reviewed evidence

What regulators assessed: The long-term reference value was based on liver and thyroid changes observed in animal studies at higher doses.

Reference values
Role
Fungicide
Long-term reference (ADI)
0–0.2 mg/kg body weight per day
Single-day reference (ARfD)
Not considered necessary by JMPR

Reviewed from WHO/FAO JMPR, 2007

dimethomorphOther / mixed5 (20.8%)0.04 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
lambda-cyhalothrinInsecticide5 (20.8%)0.02 mg/kg0.06 mg/kg0.25 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
spiroxamineOther / mixed5 (20.8%)0.02 mg/kg0.04 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
cyprodinilFungicide5 (20.8%)0.2 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Spirotetramat (partial sum)Insecticide5 (20.8%)0.05 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
tebuconazoleFungicide4 (16.7%)0.02 mg/kg0.04 mg/kg2.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
fluxapyroxadFungicide4 (16.7%)0.03 mg/kg0.06 mg/kg15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
metrafenoneFungicide4 (16.7%)0.02 mg/kg0.08 mg/kg23.597 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

The UK programme is risk-based and targets foods where residues may be expected. It is not a test of every raisins and dried grapes product sold in United Kingdom. This entry’s latest included quarterly q1 release is from 2026.

Comparable annual records are available for 2026, 2020.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Limited sample coverage. Fewer than 20 samples: useful as a monitoring snapshot, but sensitive to individual results.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these raisins and dried grapes results

Were pesticide residues detected on raisins and dried grapes?

89.5% of 19 standard-grown samples in the 2026 UK Pesticide Residues in Food monitoring dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean raisins and dried grapes were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic raisins and dried grapes?

The monitored organic samples had a 20% detection rate, compared with 89.5% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.