All foods/Grapefruits

2024 · Netherlands · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on grapefruits

100% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue100%Higher organic-buying priority

7 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue0%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues100%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count6Higher organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 12

Above published limit28.6%Higher organic-buying priority

Based on the reported compliance evaluation

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 0 samples

Residue detail

What was found on grapefruits?

The most frequently detected residues across all 7 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

7samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
Imazalil (RD)Other / mixed7 (100%)1.8 mg/kg2.9 mg/kg4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Thiabendazole (RD)Other / mixed5 (71.4%)1.3 mg/kg5 mg/kg7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Azoxystrobin (RD)Other / mixed4 (57.1%)0.04 mg/kg0.071 mg/kg15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyrimethanil (RD)Other / mixed4 (57.1%)0.323 mg/kg1.6 mg/kg8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Copper (RD)Other / mixed3 (42.9%)0.4 mg/kg0.79 mg/kg20 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Methoxyfenozide (RD)Other / mixed3 (42.9%)0.029 mg/kg0.054 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Glufosinate Equivalents (RD)Other / mixed2 (28.6%)0.17 mg/kg0.2 mg/kg0.05 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Bromide Ion (RD)Other / mixed2 (28.6%)1.835 mg/kg3 mg/kg30 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fosetyl (RD)Other / mixed2 (28.6%)1.015 mg/kg1.4 mg/kg75 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Chlorfenapyr (RD)Other / mixed2 (28.6%)0.007 mg/kg0.009 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyraclostrobin (RD)Other / mixed2 (28.6%)0.059 mg/kg0.066 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Spirotetramat (RD)Other / mixed2 (28.6%)0.011 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
2,4-D (RD)Other / mixed2 (28.6%)0.061 mg/kg0.07 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
2-Phenylphenol (RD)Other / mixed1 (14.3%)0.73 mg/kg0.73 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fenpropathrin (RD)Other / mixed1 (14.3%)0.27 mg/kg0.27 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Difenoconazole (RD)Other / mixed1 (14.3%)0.013 mg/kg0.013 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fluopyram (RD)Other / mixed1 (14.3%)0.016 mg/kg0.016 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Tau-Fluvalinate (RD)Other / mixed1 (14.3%)0.022 mg/kg0.022 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyridaben (RD)Other / mixed1 (14.3%)0.012 mg/kg0.012 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Acetamiprid (RD)Other / mixed1 (14.3%)0.007 mg/kg0.007 mg/kg0.9 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every grapefruits product sold in Netherlands. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Limited sample coverage. Fewer than 20 samples: useful as a monitoring snapshot, but sensitive to individual results.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these grapefruits results

Were pesticide residues detected on grapefruits?

100% of 7 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean grapefruits were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic grapefruits?

There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.