All foods/Chicken, fresh fat tissue

2024 · Ireland · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on chicken, fresh fat tissue

0% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue0%Lower organic-buying priority

1 sample, standard-grown

No quantified residue100%Lower organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues0%Lower organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 0

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Based on the reported compliance evaluation

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 0 samples

Residue detail

What was found on chicken, fresh fat tissue?

The most frequently detected residues across all 1 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

1samples checked

No quantified residues were recorded for this food.

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every chicken, fresh fat tissue product sold in Ireland. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Limited sample coverage. Fewer than 20 samples: useful as a monitoring snapshot, but sensitive to individual results.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these chicken, fresh fat tissue results

Were pesticide residues detected on chicken, fresh fat tissue?

0% of 1 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean chicken, fresh fat tissue were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic chicken, fresh fat tissue?

There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.