All foods/Tomatoes

2024 · Greece · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on tomatoes

90.9% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue90.9%Higher organic-buying priority

11 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue9.1%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues90.9%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count3Higher organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 11

Above published limit9.1%Higher organic-buying priority

Based on the reported compliance evaluation

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 0 samples

Residue detail

What was found on tomatoes?

The most frequently detected residues across all 11 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

11samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
Difenoconazole (RD)Other / mixed5 (45.5%)0.027 mg/kg0.08 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Boscalid (RD)Other / mixed4 (36.4%)0.023 mg/kg0.058 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Acetamiprid (RD)Other / mixed3 (27.3%)0.067 mg/kg0.14 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Azoxystrobin (RD)Other / mixed3 (27.3%)0.041 mg/kg0.06 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Dimethomorph (RD)Other / mixed3 (27.3%)0.055 mg/kg0.14 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Sulfoxaflor (RD)Other / mixed3 (27.3%)0.011 mg/kg0.044 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fluopyram (RD)Other / mixed2 (18.2%)0.014 mg/kg0.017 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Indoxacarb (RD)Other / mixed2 (18.2%)0.027 mg/kg0.038 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Chlorantraniliprole (RD)Other / mixed2 (18.2%)0.021 mg/kg0.029 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Metalaxyl And Metalaxyl-M (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.045 mg/kg0.045 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Cypermethrin (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.24 mg/kg0.24 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Spirodiclofen (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.01 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Thiophanate-methyl (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.046 mg/kg0.046 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Cyantraniliprole (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.011 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyraclostrobin (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.011 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Propamocarb (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.04 mg/kg0.04 mg/kg4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Methoxyfenozide (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.015 mg/kg0.015 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Clothianidin (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.01 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg0.04 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Metaflumizone (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.029 mg/kg0.029 mg/kg0.7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Mandipropamid (RD)Other / mixed1 (9.1%)0.12 mg/kg0.12 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every tomatoes product sold in Greece. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Limited sample coverage. Fewer than 20 samples: useful as a monitoring snapshot, but sensitive to individual results.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these tomatoes results

Were pesticide residues detected on tomatoes?

90.9% of 11 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean tomatoes were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic tomatoes?

There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.