All foods/Romaines

2024 · Finland · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on romaines

0% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue0%Lower organic-buying priority

1 sample, standard-grown

No quantified residue100%Lower organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues0%Lower organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 0

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Based on the reported compliance evaluation

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 1 sample

Residue detail

What was found on romaines?

The most frequently detected residues across all 2 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

2samples checked

No quantified residues were recorded for this food.

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every romaines product sold in Finland. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Limited sample coverage. Fewer than 20 samples: useful as a monitoring snapshot, but sensitive to individual results.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these romaines results

Were pesticide residues detected on romaines?

0% of 1 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean romaines were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic romaines?

There were only 1 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.