All foods/Rice and similar

2024 · Germany · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on rice and similar

35% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue35%Moderate organic-buying priority

20 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue65%Moderate organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues15%Moderate organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count0Lower organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 2

Above published limit5%Higher organic-buying priority

Based on the reported compliance evaluation

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 1 sample

Residue detail

What was found on rice and similar?

The most frequently detected residues across all 21 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

21samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
Tebuconazole (RD)Other / mixed3 (14.3%)0.023 mg/kg0.024 mg/kg1.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Copper (RD)Other / mixed2 (9.5%)1.695 mg/kg2.03 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Isoprothiolane (RD)Other / mixed1 (4.8%)0.41 mg/kg0.41 mg/kg6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Acetamiprid (RD)Other / mixed1 (4.8%)0.021 mg/kg0.021 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Mercury (RD)Other / mixed1 (4.8%)0.005 mg/kg0.005 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Deltamethrin (RD)Other / mixed1 (4.8%)0.041 mg/kg0.041 mg/kg1 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Azoxystrobin (RD)Other / mixed1 (4.8%)0.011 mg/kg0.011 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every rice and similar product sold in Germany. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Moderate sample coverage. 20–49 samples: a useful monitoring snapshot, though not a population estimate.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these rice and similar results

Were pesticide residues detected on rice and similar?

35% of 20 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean rice and similar were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic rice and similar?

There were only 1 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.