All foods/Grapefruits

2024 · Germany · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on grapefruits

100% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue100%Higher organic-buying priority

26 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue0%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues65.4%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count2Higher organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 7

Above published limit3.8%Higher organic-buying priority

Based on the reported compliance evaluation

Organic comparisonNot availableNot enough published data

Withheld: only 0 samples

Residue detail

What was found on grapefruits?

The most frequently detected residues across all 26 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

26samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
Imazalil (RD)Other / mixed21 (80.8%)0.66 mg/kg1.936 mg/kg4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Copper (RD)Other / mixed8 (30.8%)0.34 mg/kg0.481 mg/kg20 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Thiabendazole (RD)Other / mixed7 (26.9%)0.66 mg/kg1.3 mg/kg7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyrimethanil (RD)Other / mixed6 (23.1%)0.82 mg/kg1.535 mg/kg8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Dithiocarbamates (RD)Other / mixed3 (11.5%)0.017 mg/kg0.047 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Malathion (RD)Other / mixed3 (11.5%)0.116 mg/kg0.302 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fosetyl (RD)Other / mixed3 (11.5%)1.555 mg/kg2 mg/kg75 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Acetamiprid (RD)Other / mixed2 (7.7%)0.04 mg/kg0.049 mg/kg0.9 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Methoxyfenozide (RD)Other / mixed2 (7.7%)0.042 mg/kg0.069 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fludioxonil (RD)Other / mixed2 (7.7%)0.916 mg/kg1.08 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyridaben (RD)Other / mixed2 (7.7%)0.02 mg/kg0.02 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Azoxystrobin (RD)Other / mixed2 (7.7%)0.486 mg/kg0.945 mg/kg15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Sulfoxaflor (RD)Other / mixed2 (7.7%)0.041 mg/kg0.054 mg/kg0.15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyraclostrobin (RD)Other / mixed2 (7.7%)0.036 mg/kg0.037 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Trifloxystrobin (RD)Other / mixed1 (3.8%)0.027 mg/kg0.027 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
2-Phenylphenol (RD)Other / mixed1 (3.8%)0.019 mg/kg0.019 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Spirotetramat (RD)Other / mixed1 (3.8%)0.046 mg/kg0.046 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyriproxyfen (RD)Other / mixed1 (3.8%)0.028 mg/kg0.028 mg/kg0.6 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Imidacloprid (RD)Other / mixed1 (3.8%)0.042 mg/kg0.042 mg/kg0.9 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Tau-Fluvalinate (RD)Other / mixed1 (3.8%)0.019 mg/kg0.019 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every grapefruits product sold in Germany. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Moderate sample coverage. 20–49 samples: a useful monitoring snapshot, though not a population estimate.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these grapefruits results

Were pesticide residues detected on grapefruits?

100% of 26 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean grapefruits were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic grapefruits?

There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.