All foods/Apples

2024 · Germany · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year

Pesticide residues found on apples

84.2% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue84.2%Higher organic-buying priority

38 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue15.8%Higher organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues57.9%Higher organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count2Higher organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 7

Above published limit0%Moderate organic-buying priority

Based on the reported compliance evaluation

Organic: any residue0%Higher organic-buying priority

6 samples, interpret cautiously

Residue detail

What was found on apples?

The most frequently detected residues across all 44 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

44samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
Captan (RD)Other / mixed17 (38.6%)0.218 mg/kg1.042 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fludioxonil (RD)Other / mixed11 (25%)0.038 mg/kg0.78 mg/kg5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Trifloxystrobin (RD)Other / mixed7 (15.9%)0.02 mg/kg0.034 mg/kg0.7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyrimethanil (RD)Other / mixed6 (13.6%)0.538 mg/kg1.4 mg/kg15 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Cyprodinil (RD)Other / mixed6 (13.6%)0.031 mg/kg0.225 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Boscalid (RD)Other / mixed6 (13.6%)0.112 mg/kg0.15 mg/kg2 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Pyraclostrobin (RD)Other / mixed5 (11.4%)0.043 mg/kg0.073 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Acetamiprid (RD)Other / mixed4 (9.1%)0.027 mg/kg0.052 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Dithianon (RD)Other / mixed3 (6.8%)0.04 mg/kg0.11 mg/kg3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Chlorantraniliprole (RD)Other / mixed3 (6.8%)0.011 mg/kg0.013 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Mefentrifluconazole (RD)Other / mixed2 (4.5%)0.02 mg/kg0.023 mg/kg0.4 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fluopyram (RD)Other / mixed2 (4.5%)0.02 mg/kg0.025 mg/kg0.000 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Flonicamid (RD)Other / mixed2 (4.5%)0.04 mg/kg0.066 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Folpet (RD)Other / mixed1 (2.3%)0.034 mg/kg0.034 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Dodine (RD)Other / mixed1 (2.3%)0.016 mg/kg0.016 mg/kg0.9 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Tebuconazole (RD)Other / mixed1 (2.3%)0.022 mg/kg0.022 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Methoxyfenozide (RD)Other / mixed1 (2.3%)0.014 mg/kg0.014 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Fenpyroximate (RD)Other / mixed1 (2.3%)0.023 mg/kg0.023 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Tebufenpyrad (RD)Other / mixed1 (2.3%)0.017 mg/kg0.017 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
Difenoconazole (RD)Other / mixed1 (2.3%)0.042 mg/kg0.042 mg/kg0.8 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every apples product sold in Germany. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Moderate sample coverage. 20–49 samples: a useful monitoring snapshot, though not a population estimate.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these apples results

Were pesticide residues detected on apples?

84.2% of 38 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean apples were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic apples?

The monitored organic samples had a 0% detection rate, compared with 84.2% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.