3 samples, standard-grown
2024 · Bulgaria · EFSA consolidated official controls · Calendar year
Pesticide residues found on table grapes
100% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.
All reported results below quantification
Two or more residues detected
Highest observed count: 12
Based on the reported compliance evaluation
Withheld: only 0 samples
Residue detail
What was found on table grapes?
The most frequently detected residues across all 3 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.
3samples checked
Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.
What do these types mean?
- FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
- InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
- HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
- Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
- Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.
These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.
| Residue | Type | Samples | Median | Higher result | Typical published limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metalaxyl And Metalaxyl-M (RD) | Other / mixed | 2 (66.7%) | 0.067 mg/kg | 0.107 mg/kg | 2 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Pyraclostrobin (RD) | Other / mixed | 2 (66.7%) | 0.09 mg/kg | 0.15 mg/kg | 0.3 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Boscalid (RD) | Other / mixed | 2 (66.7%) | 0.238 mg/kg | 0.39 mg/kg | 5 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Cyprodinil (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.053 mg/kg | 0.053 mg/kg | 3 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Fludioxonil (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.125 mg/kg | 0.125 mg/kg | 5 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Mefentrifluconazole (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.317 mg/kg | 0.317 mg/kg | 0.9 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Lambda-cyhalothrin (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.059 mg/kg | 0.059 mg/kg | 0.08 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Dimethomorph (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.142 mg/kg | 0.142 mg/kg | 3 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Acetamiprid (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.017 mg/kg | 0.017 mg/kg | 0.5 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Cyazofamid (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.706 mg/kg | 0.706 mg/kg | 2 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Kresoxim-Methyl (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.064 mg/kg | 0.064 mg/kg | 1.5 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Penconazole (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.241 mg/kg | 0.241 mg/kg | 0.5 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Fluxapyroxad (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.018 mg/kg | 0.018 mg/kg | 3 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Dithiocarbamates (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 2.959 mg/kg | 2.959 mg/kg | 5 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
| Spirotetramat (RD) | Other / mixed | 1 (33.3%) | 0.049 mg/kg | 0.049 mg/kg | 2 mg/kg |
Health summary pending No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred. Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗ | |||||
“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.
ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.
What this tells you
A monitoring result, not a verdict.
EFSA consolidates official control results reported by national authorities; sampling strategies and food coverage differ between countries. It is not a test of every table grapes product sold in Bulgaria. This entry’s latest included calendar year release is from 2024.
Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.
Limited sample coverage. Fewer than 20 samples: useful as a monitoring snapshot, but sensitive to individual results.
Compare organic and standard-grown results →Common questions
How to read these table grapes results
Were pesticide residues detected on table grapes?
100% of 3 standard-grown samples in the 2024 EFSA consolidated official controls dataset had at least one quantified residue.
Does that mean table grapes were unsafe?
No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.
Should I buy organic table grapes?
There were only 0 organic samples, so Residue Lens withholds the comparison.