All foods/Celery

2025 · United Kingdom · UK Pesticide Residues in Food monitoring · Quarterly Q3–Q4

Pesticide residues found on celery

64.3% of standard-grown samples had at least one detected residue. Standard-grown means samples not identified as organic (called conventional in the source data). Detection does not, by itself, mean the food was unsafe.

Compare with other foods →
Any residue64.3%Moderate organic-buying priority

28 samples, standard-grown

No quantified residue35.7%Moderate organic-buying priority

All reported results below quantification

Multiple residues35.7%Moderate organic-buying priority

Two or more residues detected

Median residue count1Moderate organic-buying priority

Highest observed count: 3

Above published limit0%Lower organic-buying priority

Parser-based MRL comparison

Organic: any residue0%Moderate organic-buying priority

8 samples, interpret cautiously

Residue detail

What was found on celery?

The most frequently detected residues across all 36 samples. This is the complete available table for this monitoring entry.

36samples checked

Detection does not establish harm. Health risk depends on both toxicity and the amount a person is exposed to.

What do these types mean?
  • FungicideControls fungal diseases such as moulds and mildews.
  • InsecticideControls insects that damage crops or stored food.
  • HerbicideControls weeds competing with a crop.
  • Growth regulatorChanges plant growth, development or ripening.
  • Other / mixedCovers multiple substances or a role that cannot be reliably assigned from the published name.

These labels describe agricultural function, not a toxicity ranking.

ResidueTypeSamplesMedianHigher resultTypical published limit
difenoconazoleFungicide9 (25%)0.02 mg/kg0.04 mg/kg7 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
prosulfocarbOther / mixed7 (19.4%)0.02 mg/kg0.08 mg/kg1.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
azoxystrobinFungicide4 (11.1%)0.015 mg/kg0.02 mg/kg30 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
flonicamid (sum)Insecticide3 (8.3%)0.02 mg/kg0.03 mg/kg0.3 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
chlorantraniliproleInsecticide3 (8.3%)0.01 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg10 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
tebuconazoleFungicide2 (5.6%)0.01 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg0.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
boscalidFungicide2 (5.6%)0.015 mg/kg0.02 mg/kg9 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
cyprodinilFungicide1 (2.8%)0.02 mg/kg0.02 mg/kg30 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗
fludioxonilFungicide1 (2.8%)0.01 mg/kg0.01 mg/kg1.5 mg/kg
Health summary pending

No reviewed substance-specific summary is available, so no health effect is inferred.

Search WHO/FAO JMPR ↗

“Higher result” is an approximate 95th-percentile observed concentration, not a safety threshold. Amounts of different pesticides should not be added together or compared directly. Functional types describe their usual agricultural role; they are not hazard or toxicity rankings.

ADI and ARfD are intake reference values, not limits for one food sample. A personal assessment would also require consumption, body-weight and wider exposure data. Source programmes report legal Maximum Residue Level results separately.

What this tells you

A monitoring result, not a verdict.

The UK programme is risk-based and targets foods where residues may be expected. It is not a test of every celery product sold in United Kingdom. This entry’s latest included quarterly q3–q4 release is from 2025.

Published MRLs or tolerances are regulatory limits associated with pesticide use. Consumer-risk assessment is a separate process.

Moderate sample coverage. 20–49 samples: a useful monitoring snapshot, though not a population estimate.

Compare organic and standard-grown results →

Common questions

How to read these celery results

Were pesticide residues detected on celery?

64.3% of 28 standard-grown samples in the 2025 UK Pesticide Residues in Food monitoring dataset had at least one quantified residue.

Does that mean celery were unsafe?

No. A laboratory detection is not, by itself, a consumer-risk finding. Regulators assess dietary risk separately.

Should I buy organic celery?

The monitored organic samples had a 0% detection rate, compared with 64.3% for standard-grown samples. This is a shopping-priority comparison, not a health-risk score.